Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

Thursday, October 25, 2012

Lethal Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Wood Pellet Storerooms--Two Cases and a Review of the Literature

Skip Navigation
Saskia Gauthier1,*, Hildegard Grass2, Martin Lory3, Thomas Krämer1, Michael Thali1 and Christine Bartsch1
1 Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Zurich 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
2 Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospitals 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
3 Forensic Institute 8004 Zurich, Switzerland ? * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +0416355611; fax: +41446356851 saskia.gauthier{at}irm.uzh.ch Received January 11, 2012. Revision received March 14, 2012. Accepted May 12, 2012. The installation of wood pellet heating as a cost-effective and climatically neutral source of energy for private households has increased steadily in recent years. We report two deaths that occurred within the space of about a year in wood pellet storerooms of private households in German-speaking countries and were investigated by forensic medical teams. This is the first report of fatalities in this special context as is shown in the literature review. Both victims died of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning; one of the victims was a woman who was 4 months pregnant. Measurements at the scene detected life-threatening CO concentrations (7500 ppm, >500 ppm), which were not significantly reduced after ventilation of the storerooms as required by regulations. We carried out a series of experiments in order to confirm CO production by wood pellets. Thirty kilograms of freshly produced pellets from two different manufacturers were stored for 16 days in airtight containers at 26°C with different relative humidities. CO concentrations between 3100 and 4700 ppm were measured in all containers. There were no notable differences between the wood pellet products or storage at different humidities. Emission of CO from wood pellets has already been described, but fatal accidents have previously been reported only in association with pellet transport on cargo ships or storage in silos. It is therefore a new finding that fatal accidents may also occur in the wood pellet storerooms of private households. We show that significant CO concentrations can build up even when these rooms are ventilated in accordance with the regulations and that such levels may cause the death of healthy persons, as described in the following. As the safety recommendations from the wood pellet industry are inadequate, we consider that further fatal accidents are likely to occur and recommend urgent revision of the safety regulations.
Keywords: © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis ArticleAnn Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (7): 755-763. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes047 Current IssueThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Local Exhaust Ventilation for the Control of Welding Fumes in the Construction Industry--A Literature Review

Skip Navigation
Michael R. Flynn1,* and Pam Susi2
1Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA
2Center for Construction Research and Training, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 1000, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA ?* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +919-966-3473; fax: +919-966-7911; e-mail: Mike_flynn{at}unc.edu Received November 18, 2011. Accepted January 16, 2012. Arc welding is a common unit operation in the construction industry, where frequent changes in location and welding position make it more difficult to control fume exposures than in industries where fixed locations are the norm. Welders may be exposed to a variety of toxic airborne contaminants including manganese (Mn) and hexavalent chromium (CrVI). Local exhaust ventilation (LEV) is a well-known engineering control for welding fumes but has not been adopted widely in the construction industry. This literature review presents data on the performance of a variety of LEV systems for welding fume control from the construction (five references), shipyard (five references), and other industries. The studies indicate that LEV can reduce fume exposures to total particulate, Mn, and CrVI to levels below currently relevant standards. Field studies suggest that 40–50% or more reduction in exposure is possible with portable or fixed LEV systems relative to natural ventilation but that correct positioning of the hood and adequate exhaust flow rates are essential. Successful implementation of extraction guns for gas metal arc welding (GMAW) and flux core arc welding has been demonstrated, indicating that a successful balance between extraction airflow and shielding gas requirements is possible. Work practices are an important part of achieving successful control of fume exposures; in particular, positioning the hood close to the arc, checking exhaust flow rates, and avoiding the plume. Further research is needed on hood size effects for controlling welding fume with portable LEV systems and identifying and overcoming barriers to LEV use in construction.
© The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis ArticleAnn Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (7): 764-776. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes018 First published online: March 29, 2012 Current IssueThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Local Exhaust Ventilation for the Control of Welding Fumes in the Construction Industry--A Literature Review

Skip Navigation
Michael R. Flynn1,* and Pam Susi2
1Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA
2Center for Construction Research and Training, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 1000, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA ?* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +919-966-3473; fax: +919-966-7911; e-mail: Mike_flynn{at}unc.edu Received November 18, 2011. Accepted January 16, 2012. Arc welding is a common unit operation in the construction industry, where frequent changes in location and welding position make it more difficult to control fume exposures than in industries where fixed locations are the norm. Welders may be exposed to a variety of toxic airborne contaminants including manganese (Mn) and hexavalent chromium (CrVI). Local exhaust ventilation (LEV) is a well-known engineering control for welding fumes but has not been adopted widely in the construction industry. This literature review presents data on the performance of a variety of LEV systems for welding fume control from the construction (five references), shipyard (five references), and other industries. The studies indicate that LEV can reduce fume exposures to total particulate, Mn, and CrVI to levels below currently relevant standards. Field studies suggest that 40–50% or more reduction in exposure is possible with portable or fixed LEV systems relative to natural ventilation but that correct positioning of the hood and adequate exhaust flow rates are essential. Successful implementation of extraction guns for gas metal arc welding (GMAW) and flux core arc welding has been demonstrated, indicating that a successful balance between extraction airflow and shielding gas requirements is possible. Work practices are an important part of achieving successful control of fume exposures; in particular, positioning the hood close to the arc, checking exhaust flow rates, and avoiding the plume. Further research is needed on hood size effects for controlling welding fume with portable LEV systems and identifying and overcoming barriers to LEV use in construction.
© The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis ArticleAnn Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (7): 764-776. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes018 First published online: March 29, 2012 Current IssueThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Dose-response relationship between work-related cumulative postural exposure and low back pain: A systematic review

Skip Navigation
Daniel Cury Ribeiro1,2,*, Daniela Aldabe3, J. Haxby Abbott4, Gisela Sole1 and Stephan Milosavljevic1
1University of Otago, Centre for Physiotherapy Research, School of Physiotherapy, PO Box 56, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
2Otago Institute of Sport and Adventure, Otago Polytechnic, Private Bag 1910, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
3University of Otago, School of Physical Education, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand
4University of Otago, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin 9054, New Zealand ?* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 0064-03-479-3666; fax: 0064-03-479-3676; e-mail: daniel.cury.ribeiro{at}gmail.com Received August 22, 2011. Accepted January 13, 2012. Objectives: To assess the evidence for a dose–response relationship between ROM, duration, and frequency of trunk flexion, and risk of occupational LBP.
Methods: An electronic systematic search was conducted using Medline, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, EMBASE, and Scopus databases focusing on cohort and case–control studies. Studies were included if they focused on non-specific LBP and postural exposure, considering ROM, duration, or frequency of trunk flexion as independent variables. No language restriction was imposed. Included studies were assessed for risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for observational studies and a summary of evidence is presented. Results: Eight studies were included and all were methodologically rated as high quality. The included studies yielded a total of 7023 subjects who were considered for risk analysis. Different outcome measures for postural exposure were adopted making meta-analysis difficult to perform. Conclusions: We could not find a clear dose–response relationship for work posture exposures and LBP. Limited evidence was found for ROM and duration of sustained flexed posture as risk factor for LBP. We found no evidence for frequency of trunk flexion as a risk factor for LBP. © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis ArticleAnn Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (6): 684-696. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes003 First published online: February 22, 2012 Current IssueThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Saturday, October 20, 2012

Lethal Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Wood Pellet Storerooms--Two Cases and a Review of the Literature

Skip Navigation
Saskia Gauthier1,*, Hildegard Grass2, Martin Lory3, Thomas Krämer1, Michael Thali1 and Christine Bartsch1
1 Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Zurich 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
2 Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospitals 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
3 Forensic Institute 8004 Zurich, Switzerland ? * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +0416355611; fax: +41446356851 saskia.gauthier{at}irm.uzh.ch Received January 11, 2012. Revision received March 14, 2012. Accepted May 12, 2012. The installation of wood pellet heating as a cost-effective and climatically neutral source of energy for private households has increased steadily in recent years. We report two deaths that occurred within the space of about a year in wood pellet storerooms of private households in German-speaking countries and were investigated by forensic medical teams. This is the first report of fatalities in this special context as is shown in the literature review. Both victims died of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning; one of the victims was a woman who was 4 months pregnant. Measurements at the scene detected life-threatening CO concentrations (7500 ppm, >500 ppm), which were not significantly reduced after ventilation of the storerooms as required by regulations. We carried out a series of experiments in order to confirm CO production by wood pellets. Thirty kilograms of freshly produced pellets from two different manufacturers were stored for 16 days in airtight containers at 26°C with different relative humidities. CO concentrations between 3100 and 4700 ppm were measured in all containers. There were no notable differences between the wood pellet products or storage at different humidities. Emission of CO from wood pellets has already been described, but fatal accidents have previously been reported only in association with pellet transport on cargo ships or storage in silos. It is therefore a new finding that fatal accidents may also occur in the wood pellet storerooms of private households. We show that significant CO concentrations can build up even when these rooms are ventilated in accordance with the regulations and that such levels may cause the death of healthy persons, as described in the following. As the safety recommendations from the wood pellet industry are inadequate, we consider that further fatal accidents are likely to occur and recommend urgent revision of the safety regulations.
Keywords: © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis ArticleAnn Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (7): 755-763. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes047 Current IssueThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Friday, October 19, 2012

Lethal Carbon Monoxide Poisoning in Wood Pellet Storerooms--Two Cases and a Review of the Literature

Skip Navigation
Saskia Gauthier1,*, Hildegard Grass2, Martin Lory3, Thomas Krämer1, Michael Thali1 and Christine Bartsch1
1 Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Zurich 8057 Zurich, Switzerland;
2 Institute of Legal Medicine, University Hospitals 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany;
3 Forensic Institute 8004 Zurich, Switzerland ? * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +0416355611; fax: +41446356851 saskia.gauthier{at}irm.uzh.ch Received January 11, 2012. Revision received March 14, 2012. Accepted May 12, 2012. The installation of wood pellet heating as a cost-effective and climatically neutral source of energy for private households has increased steadily in recent years. We report two deaths that occurred within the space of about a year in wood pellet storerooms of private households in German-speaking countries and were investigated by forensic medical teams. This is the first report of fatalities in this special context as is shown in the literature review. Both victims died of carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning; one of the victims was a woman who was 4 months pregnant. Measurements at the scene detected life-threatening CO concentrations (7500 ppm, >500 ppm), which were not significantly reduced after ventilation of the storerooms as required by regulations. We carried out a series of experiments in order to confirm CO production by wood pellets. Thirty kilograms of freshly produced pellets from two different manufacturers were stored for 16 days in airtight containers at 26°C with different relative humidities. CO concentrations between 3100 and 4700 ppm were measured in all containers. There were no notable differences between the wood pellet products or storage at different humidities. Emission of CO from wood pellets has already been described, but fatal accidents have previously been reported only in association with pellet transport on cargo ships or storage in silos. It is therefore a new finding that fatal accidents may also occur in the wood pellet storerooms of private households. We show that significant CO concentrations can build up even when these rooms are ventilated in accordance with the regulations and that such levels may cause the death of healthy persons, as described in the following. As the safety recommendations from the wood pellet industry are inadequate, we consider that further fatal accidents are likely to occur and recommend urgent revision of the safety regulations.
Keywords: © The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis ArticleAnn Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (7): 755-763. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes047 Current IssueThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Local Exhaust Ventilation for the Control of Welding Fumes in the Construction Industry--A Literature Review

Skip Navigation
Michael R. Flynn1,* and Pam Susi2
1Department of Environmental Sciences and Engineering, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7431, USA
2Center for Construction Research and Training, 8484 Georgia Avenue, Suite 1000, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA ?* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +919-966-3473; fax: +919-966-7911; e-mail: Mike_flynn{at}unc.edu Received November 18, 2011. Accepted January 16, 2012. Arc welding is a common unit operation in the construction industry, where frequent changes in location and welding position make it more difficult to control fume exposures than in industries where fixed locations are the norm. Welders may be exposed to a variety of toxic airborne contaminants including manganese (Mn) and hexavalent chromium (CrVI). Local exhaust ventilation (LEV) is a well-known engineering control for welding fumes but has not been adopted widely in the construction industry. This literature review presents data on the performance of a variety of LEV systems for welding fume control from the construction (five references), shipyard (five references), and other industries. The studies indicate that LEV can reduce fume exposures to total particulate, Mn, and CrVI to levels below currently relevant standards. Field studies suggest that 40–50% or more reduction in exposure is possible with portable or fixed LEV systems relative to natural ventilation but that correct positioning of the hood and adequate exhaust flow rates are essential. Successful implementation of extraction guns for gas metal arc welding (GMAW) and flux core arc welding has been demonstrated, indicating that a successful balance between extraction airflow and shielding gas requirements is possible. Work practices are an important part of achieving successful control of fume exposures; in particular, positioning the hood close to the arc, checking exhaust flow rates, and avoiding the plume. Further research is needed on hood size effects for controlling welding fume with portable LEV systems and identifying and overcoming barriers to LEV use in construction.
© The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis ArticleAnn Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (7): 764-776. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes018 First published online: March 29, 2012 Current IssueThe Annals of Occupational Hygiene
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.

View the original article here

Thursday, October 18, 2012

Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Stumbleupon Favorites More

 
Design by Free WordPress Themes | Bloggerized by Lasantha - Premium Blogger Themes | Facebook Themes