Skip Navigation
Patrick O’shaughnessy*, Thomas Peters, Kelley Donham, Craig Taylor, Ralph Altmaier and Kevin Kelly
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, The University of Iowa College of Public Health, 105 River Street, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA ?* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: 319-335-4202; fax: 319-335-4225; e-mail: patrick-oshaughnessy{at}uiowa.edu Received December 7, 2011. Accepted January 9, 2012. Field measurements of personal and area dust and endotoxin concentrations were obtained while agricultural workers performed two work tasks that have been previously unreported: hog load-out and swine building power washing. Hog load-out involves moving hogs from their pens in finishing buildings into a truck for transport to a meat processor. High pressure power washing is conducted for sanitation purposes after a building has been emptied of hogs to remove surface and floor debris. This debri consists of feed, feces, and hog dander as dust or an encrusted form. The hog load-out process necessarily increases pig activity which is known to increase airborne dust concentrations. An unintended consequence of power washing is that the material covering surfaces is forcibly ejected into the atmosphere, creating the potential for a highly concentrated aerosol exposure to workers. The load-out process resulted in a median personal inhalable mass concentration of 7.14 mg m- 3 and median endotoxin concentration of 12?150 endotoxin units (EU) m- 3. When converted to an 8-h time-weighted average for a ‘total’ sampler, one of the 19 samples exceeded a regulatory limit of 15 mg m- 3. An impinger was used to sample power washing endotoxin concentrations, which resulted in a median personal concentration of 40?350 EU m- 3. These concentrations were among the highest found in the literature for any occupation. With the lack of engineering controls present to reduce airborne contaminant concentrations in swine buildings, either respirator use or a reduction in exposure time is recommended while performing these tasks.
© The Author 2012. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene SocietyThis Article
Ann Occup Hyg (2012) 56 (7): 843-851. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mes013 First published online: March 16, 2012 Current Issue
Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.
View the original article here
0 comments:
Post a Comment